Archive for Palmer Gulch Trestle

Palmer Gulch: Railroad Author John Schmale to Adventurer John Vonderlin

PG1

Author John Schmale to Adventurer John Vonderlin

Email John Schmale: outwest@sonic.net

Email John Vonderlin: benloudman@sbcglobal.net

Hi John,

It is nice to hear from you.

It has been about 30 years since I have been to Palmer Gulch. I am sure that a lot has changed since then. My friend and I walked into the beach there. Many trestle bents were still in place though the had fallen to the ground.
The Palmer Gulch trestle was built in 1909 and that is the year all construction halted. I have somewhere a newspaper article describing, and I was also told by Ocean Shore RR engineer Adolph Seigel. that the construction company building the Ocean Shore Railway tried to cut down a bluff and fill the right of way just north of San Gregorio by use of Hydraulic monitors from the gold mining days. It proved too hard to contain the debris so they gave up on the idea. The tracks were to run very close to the ocean and to use cut and fill construction. I have enclosed three photos of the Palmer Gulch trestle. One shows Lorin Silleman standing on trestle taking a photo. I think the year is 1938. Notice the sagging. The second one is the original that Stanger used in his book. It is Palmer Gulch.
PG2
I am certain that there were no other trestles on the Northern Division. The shot looking up shows the sag in the center. I am sure that much of the grade put in by the Ocean Shore RR has fallen away. This last shot
PG#
gives one an idea of how high from the surf the bed of the trestle was.
Regards,
John Schmale
John & Kristina Schmale’s most recent book is called “Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad, ” published by Arcadia. For more info, please click here

Comments off

John Vonderlin: Ocean Shore RR: The Last Cut is NOT the Deepest (Part 2)

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John: benloudman@sbcglobal.net

Hi June,

This post is a continuation about the events precipitated by my noticing a 1908 picture of the Palmer Gulch trestle in Dr. Stanger’s book, “Sawmills in the Redwoods” In the photo, the trestle of the Ocean Shore Railroad (OSRR), is shown entering a deep cut as it heads south along the bluffs just north of San Gregorio Beach. Because the remnants of the trackbed from the end-of-the-line Tunitas station to the canyon the trestle spanned manifest no cuts I’m aware of, I was surprised by what the picture showed. Today the remnants that still exist are just a series of flat ledge sections with washouts between them.

Pict1

With a second visit recently, I discovered there had been a massive cliff collapse of the promontory that formed the cut, sometime before 1972. This picture I took illustrates that collapse today.

Pict2

It didn’t look much different nearly forty years ago as shown in CCRP Picture #7218039 at the California Coastal Records Project website. My feeling is that sometime after 1908, the Ocean Shore Railroad construction initiated or accelerated the natural processes involved in coastal erosion, and a huge chunk of cliff-side fell into the ocean, leaving a barren scar for over a hundred yards south, even to this day.

Satisfied that I had my answer, we started hiking back to the car when I decided to do some cliff-climbing to bolster my belief that the track route had swung inland at the nude beach parking lot and avoided the steep but fragile bluffs just north of San Gregorio beach and nicely lined up with the best spot for the trestle to cross the San Gregorio Creek. That being about where Highway 1 crosses the creek. I had settled on this belief after finding no track remnant along the cliffs south of the path that leads to the beach from the nude beach. Instead you see a highly eroded stretch, ending in a sheer cliff from which I’m shooting the picture below

Pict3

When, during my first visit, I had located several deep, seemingly manmade ditches, near the intersection of Highway 1 and 84, that were in a straight line between the likely spot the trestle would have crossed the creek and the track’s path if it had taken an inward turn, or so it seemed obvious in my mind. Though several parallel ditches or channels were there, instead of one giant one as at Pomponio Beach, and, as I’ve posted about before, I just assumed that was the stage they were at when the Ocean Shore Railroad’s financial house of cards collapsed. An old newspaper article mentioned there were work gangs at numerous spots along the gap between Scott Creek and Tunitas, with 80% of the grading complete when work was halted.

The reason I made the precarious climb to this one section  was that I was bothered by the fact that, if you examine what I assume are the remnants of the trackbed south of Tunitas on California Coastal Records Project (CCRP) (Pictures #6217 -6221) you see trees often growing on them. Obviously, it makes sense that a flat area would provide a more hospitable site for tree growth then a steep cliff. As you are connecting the dots of track remnants heading south, it bothered me that the trees seemed to continue beyond where I thought the track had turned inland. You can see that on CCRP by looking at Pictures #6219 to 6221. South of there the line of trees disappears. It was in that essentially treeless section that I began exploring.

By climbing up the steep sand dune piled against the cliff, and clawing my way across the steep slope made ball-bearing-slippery by the loose sand, I found myself on a flat projection, nearly invisible from the beach. I had a revelation. This IS a track remnant. Nature does not usually create flat ledges in sand dunes and this was too perfectly flat for anything but a manmade feature. Looking north I thought I could see another short ledge segment across a huge sandslide that filled the gap. Here’s a picture of what it looks like looking from the ledge towards the point I had shot the previous shot from the clifftop. I’ve marked the point I made that shot with parentheses.

Pict4

Realizing I had been wrong, I was able to return yesterday to look once again for any sign of a cut that would have connected this track remnant to grading leading to the trestle over San Gregorio Creek. I was embarrassed to see it was incredibly obvious. I’m hoping I hadn’t noticed it because I was still blind in my left eye at the time I had missed it. But, it is so easy to see, even that isn’t a very good excuse.

It’s huge, but not anywhere as near finished as the Pomponio cut. Here are a few pictures of it from the parking lot  Pict6

and from the top of the cut. Such a huge cut couldn’t have been made by erosion, because there is no watershed to supply water to erode it, as one of the rangers concurred when I pointed it out. Climbing to the head of the partially excavated cut, I saw it would have perfectly lined up with a trestle across San Gregorio Creek, as you can see in these photos.

Pict5Pict6

And when I walked further uphill, following the line of the cut if it had continued to the clifftop, I found myself looking directly down at the ledge I had just explored. Angelo, [Misthos], you are “The Man.” I’ve marked the ledge in this last picture.

Pict7

I believe it is the last bluffside remnant of the OSRR trackbed as it headed south from Tunitas. But, I may be proved wrong again.

The only loose end left to tie up was, what were those strange, obviously manmade, parallel ditches just to the north and west of the intersection of Highway 84 and Highway 1 that I had thought were the beginning of the sluice cuts? I think the answer to that is provided by looking at the CCRP picture of the area from 1972. (Picture # 7218036.

It shows, not far to the north from the head of the cuts, that there is a fair sized lake, impounded by a low earthen dam, and with a much smaller pond/wetland area below that. Though the cuts probably weren’t caused by overflow from the lake, but rather were constructed, I’m sure they are related to the lake. Note that in Picture #197218039 from 1972, the hillside below the lake, and above the parking lot, shows lines that run perpendicular to the cuts, east and west across the hillside. I remember walking in a three- foot- wide ditch  on my first visit there, just where the bare sand forms one of those lines in the 1972 photo. I had thought it was an erosion control ditch of modern construction when I saw it on my first trip. I now think it was built for some kind of irrigation for farming at some point in time.

I’m afraid I’ve got to admit, just as at the end of the Pescadero Creek Hole-in-the-Wall series of postings I made last year, there’s still plenty I can learn from oldtimers, who have clear memories of what they saw long ago. Oldtimers 2, Young Shmart Feller 0. Enjoy. John

Comments off

Pilmigrage to the Palmer Gulch Trestle by John Vonderlin

Story by John Vonderlin

(email John: benloudman@sbcglobal.net)

Hi June,
We made a pilgrimage to the remains of the Palmer Gulch Trestle yesterday to get some pictures before nature completely erases these most southerly structural signs of the Ocean Shore Railroad’s ambitions to run a railroad down this coast.

As you know the Tunitas station is considered the “End of the Line” for the Ocean Shore Railroad because that was as far as the rails got. The Tunitas Creek Trestle was built south of that, but rails hadn’t been extended over it when the Great Quake of 1906 shook up the company’s finances so badly, its dreams permanently smashed of connecting with the southern section that had reached as far as Swanton in Santa Cruz County.

Though many of the other trestles needed to bridge this missing gap had been surveyed south of Tunitas, only the Palmer Gulch Trestle was built. It stood as a forlorn symbol of dreams unrealized, until a fire caused its collapse decades later. There isn’t much to see nowadays, but the changes in the local topography in the last hundred years give you an idea of what the Ocean Shore would have been in for, maintaining the trestle, had they successfully completed the whole line.

The easiest way to reach the remains is to pay the $10 entrance fee into the private nude beach, reputed to be the oldest in the United States, and park in the lot just north of San Gregorio Beach.

rr22.jpg

Take the trail to the beach and keep heading north. If that’s closed, just wait for a low tide, park at the San Gregorio Beach parking lot and head north. This way is more interesting with its sculpted cliffs, spectacular caves,

rr23.jpg

beach debris, and unusual sand dunes at the foot of the cliffs. It’s free too, if you park at the corner of Highway 84 and Highway 1, and take the slightly longer, more interesting walk.

Since the remnants are not easily noticed I’d recommend you familiarize yourself first by examining the California Coastal Records Project photos of this area. Picture #6216 has a caption of Trestle Gap and shows both the gulch and some of the remains if you view the large file. The southern portion of the Ocean Shore right-of-way is the horizontal swath of green at the lower right hand side of the picture, just above the bare part of the cliff rising from the sands of the beach.

The roght-of-way ledge looks like this if you make the risky climb up the slope.

rr44.jpg

The disintegrating remains of the trestle you can see on the slope look like this up close.

rr38.jpgrr40.jpg

The northern part of the right-of-way, where the trestle’s end rested, has not survived so well. It has been totally obscured by a landslide of loose soil.

rr47.jpg

You can see the cliffs of Tunitas where the rails stopped in the background. If you examine the nearby CCRP pictures carefully, you can follow the narrow ledge of the right-of-way all the way back to those cliffs. Or at least where it hasn’t been totally wiped out by landslides or severe erosion.

Heading further north along the beach you can see a good example of the changes the landslides and severe erosion have wrought to this landscape in the last 100 years.

You’ll also see one of the tallest coastal waterfalls in this area. Picture # 6215 on CCRP shows the gully the waterfall occurs in. It’s on the left side just north of the sinuous road snaking down the steep hill. This must not have existed in early 1900 because no trestle was needed in this area. Having experienced the loose soil and dirt-clod-like rocks in the streambed it is easy to believe this has happened since then. The harder rock at the top has kept the stream’s rapid erosion from retreating further inland, destroying the waterfall.

rr53.jpg

rr54.jpgrr55.jpg

While such rapid erosion found in this new canyon is usually considered bad, especially if you’re trying to maintain a coastal railroad line, it’s probably no coincidence that the nearby beaches are luxuriant with sand when compared to many other places along our coast. Enjoy. John Vonderlin

Comments off