John Vonderlin: Meet Loren Coburn

Story from John Vonderlin

Email John ([email protected])

Image: (close-up of the Loren Coburn home on what was then called San Gregorio Street, and today is called Stage Road.]
coburnhouse

[Note from June]:  I’d like to mention that many of the folks who appear in 19th century bios paid for the pleasure of appearing on the pages of the book.]

Hi June,
   This bio is from the 1883 San Mateo History book. Is the use of Coburil an OCR typo? I suppose so, but I’m too lazy to spend 10 minutes getting to the particular page scan. I’m interested, as a search of Coburil might turn up something I haven’t seen in the Archives. Enjoy. John
 
Loren Coburil. Brookfield, Orange county, Vermont, was the birthplace of 
Mr. Coburn, the date being January 11, 1836. When eighteen years of age 
he removed to Massachusetts where he remained until he started for California, 
in 1851. Leaving New York on the steamer Falcon for Cuba, he crossed the 
Isthmus, taking passage at Panama on the steamer Panama, arriving in San 
Francisco June 1, 1851. Mr. Coburn at once proceeded to the northern mines, 
via Sacramento and Greenwood valley, remaining four months at the placers of 
the Middle Fork of the American river. Returning to San Francisco with the 
intention of again visiting the eastern states, he was induced to embark in the 
livery business at Oakland where he remained four years, finally disposing of 
his business and purchasing another of similar character in San Francisco 
which he conducted for about eleven years. In the meantime he had pur- 
chased the Butano ranch, containing four thousand four hundred and forty- 
four acres, and afterwards added the adjoining Punto del Ano Nuevo ranch, con- 
taining four leagues, to his estate, by purchase. He then sold his business in 
San Francisco, leased his ranch to the Steele brothers in 1862, and in 1866 
went east, where he remained until 1868, when he returned to San Francisco. 
In 1872 the lease of the Steele brothers having expired, he removed to Pigeon 
Point and assumed charge of his property, and has resided there ever since. 
When Mr. Coburn returned from his eastern trip, he bought ten thousand 
acres of land on the Salinas river, in Monterey county, and has since pur- 
chased large tracts of timber land near the home ranch at Pigeon Point. His 
business at this place is dairying, stock raising and shipping. Mr. Coburn is 
eminently a self made man. His entire career has displayed a force of char- 
acter and indomitable energy, which, in the long run, never fails to land the 
possessor of these qualities on the top round of the ladder. He has amassed 
quite a fortune, but one would not observe that from his conduct, for he is a 
plain, every-day man. He is married to an estimable woman, who has in the 
past, and is now contributing her share towards leading a contented and 
happy life. 
[Image below: A young Loren Coburn]
loren1
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: Meet Loren Coburn

It’s “Bio Week”at Pescaderomemories.com–

Story from John Vonderlin

Email John ([email protected]

Let’s begin with businessman John Garretson 

Hi June,
  I thought this biographical sketch from the 1883 “History of San Mateo County,” on Archive.org might be useful to accompany Sigma’s latest correspondence that I just sent. I’ve attached a drawing of Mr. Garretson from both the 1883 and 1893 books on Archive.org, about San Mateo and the Coastal counties of Central California. Enjoy. John
 
Hon. John Garretson. The subject of this sketch was among the argo- 
nauts of this section of the State.. His portrait will be found in this volume. 
He was born in Boundbrook, Somerset county, New Jersey, November 
10, 1838, and reared on a farm until he became of age. Most of this time, 
however, was spent at school. He left home and went to New Brunswick, 
New Jersey, and was engaged as a clei’k in a dry goods store during a period 
of four years, laying the foundation of a mercantile education, which has since 
stood him in good stead. After the completion of his engagement in New 
Brunswick he went to New York City, and followed the same occupation until 
he came to this State, in 1859. He left New York City in the early spring, 
crossed the isthmus, and arrived in San Francisco in May of that year. He 
remained in that city but a few days, coming to Pescadero and assuming the 
position of clerk in a general merchandising store, owned at that time by 
Bidwell & Besse. At the end of nine months he purchased Bidwell’s interest, 
the firm name being changed to Besse & Garretson. In 1864 he sold his 
interest to Besse, and took a trip to the Sandwich Islands to recuperate his 
health. On his return he re-purchased an interest in Besse’s stock, and this 
partnership continued four or five years, when Mr. Stryker bought Besse’s 
interest, and the firm was changed to Garretson & Stryker. In January, 1873, 
Mr. Garretson disposed of his interest to James McCormack, and took a trip 
to the eastern states for his health. When he returned in 1877, he bought out 
the entire business, and has since been the sole proprietor. Mr. Garretson’s 
business interests are not wholly confined to his store at Pescadero. He is 
identified with the stage line from San Mateo to Santa Cruz, and owns an equal 
interest with Andrew Taft, of the former place. To draw a comparison is at all 
times an odious task, but to say that Mr. Garretson is one of the most highly 
respected and distinguished citizens of Pescadero or of San Mateo county is 
but to assert what is acknowledged on every hand. If further proof of this 
assertion were necessary, it would be sufficient to point out the fact that in 
1867, before this township became a part of San Mateo county, he was elec- 
ted county recorder of Santa Cruz county, and that in 1871, he was 
elected one of the supervisors of this county, being re-elected in 1873. The 
people, not content with the honors they had already conferred upon him, 
selected him to represent them in the state assembly of 1875-6. In 1881, he 
was appointed a member of the board of supervisors, and November 7, 1882, 
he was again elected to that office. Mr. Garretson married Ella Durand, June 
29, 1866, and they have five children, Alice E., Aletta Marie, John Durand, 
Ella C, and William Albert. 
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on It’s “Bio Week”at Pescaderomemories.com–

John Vonderlin: First Sawmill in San Mateo County

Story by John Vonderlin
Email John ([email protected])
Hi June,
   The excerpts below aren’t strictly Coastside related, but I find them  interesting for several reasons. One is it that they seem to contradict somewhat the info that is on the historical marker on Portola Rd concerning San Mateo County’s  first sawmill. More interesting to me is what James Weeks mentioned. I’m looking at Tess Black’s book, “Portraits of Pescadero,” and see that four Weeks brothers arrived in San Francisco after a harrowing, six month, 15,000 mile around-the-Horn voyage in 1849. There is no mention of James in the family tree she diagrams, but I’m curious if his earlier arrival along with the Gold Rush that was initiated by the famous Sutter Mill in 1848 was the reason the brothers came to Cali-for-nigh-aaaa. He was literate, and it’s not too unreasonable that he might have sent a glowing letter back home, particularly, as he spent a fair amount of time travelling to the various settlements of the time, and seemed to be enjoying his pioneer life in the redwoods. I’m going to forward this to Ed Weeks and see if he knows anything. 
   While surname frequency has changed somewhat in the United States since the mid 1800’s, Weeks is the 711th most popular surname in the United States these days, with a frequency of .017% or only 17 out of 100,000. I like the odds of some relationship existing, based on those statistics, but can’t say it’s anything more then a coincidence at this point Enjoy. John
 
 Marker Text
About three hundred feet south of this monument, on the banks of the Alambique Creek, stood San Mateo County’s first saw mill, built by Charles Brown in 1847. About the same time, Dennis Martin was building a second mill on San Francisquito Creek. Both were run by water power and were similar in structure to the famous Sutter’s Mill at Coloma.
 
1893 History of Coast Counties ofCentral California
It is a disputed question as to whom the honor of being the first to build a 
mill in this county belongs. Some claim it for Dennis Martin, and others 
award it to Charles Brown. Probably the honor should properly be divided 
between them, for in the same year ― 1847 ― Brown put up a mill on the 
Mountain Home Ranch, and Martin built one on San Francisquito Creek. The 
 
1883 History of San Mateo 
CHAPTER III. 
THE REDWOOD F0RESTS. 
   One of the first things which attracted 
the attention of Americans and other 
foreigners on their arrival in central or 
northern California, when the country was 
under Mexican rule, was the redwood forests 
of the coast counties; and there many of the 
first comers to the province commenced their 
California life. 
   This is especially true of San Mateo 
county. It is believed that the first foreign 
settler in the county (though Joseph Chap- 
man, who came in 1818, was the first in the 
county) was one William Smith, known at 
the time as “Bill, the sawyer.” The late 
James Pease claimed to have deserted from 
a Hudson Bay Company’s ship, the Nereid, 
in Yerba Buena, in 1823 or 1824, and that 
■ he wandered into the redwoods near Wood- 
side, where he found Smith, who was married 
at the time, and lived in a hut with his wife 
and baby, near where John Coppinger after- 
ward built his residence. He was the only 
foreigner there, and had already dug a saw 
pit, felled some trees, cut them into proper 
lengths, and had sawed some lumber, with 
much difficulty. He had to get his Indian 
help from the missions. The arrival of Pease 
was a fortunate event for “Bill, the sawyer,” 
who at once engaged the newcomer as an 
assistant. They cut timber for a number of 
years with whipsaws, and supplied the Cali- 
fornians with such timber as they needed in 
the adobe houses, which were being built 
then on the ranches of that region. 
   They worked at this business alone for 
several years. One day, however, they were 
joined by George Ferguson, who had de- 
serted from a ship at Sausalito, and who, after 
many adventures, arrived in the redwoods. 
Ferguson took up a claim near Smith and 
Pease, and was soon after joined by a fellow- 
seaman named James Weeks. From that 
time on others came, but did not remain per- 
manently, until the arrival of John Coppin- 
ger, a deserter from the British navy, in 1834 
or 1835. He set about felling trees and 
making lumber in a systematic manner, pro- 
curing the aid of Californians, Indians, and 
of foreigners, whenever they could be- found. 
James Weeks was first employed by ” Bill 
the sawyer,” and Ferguson, who was with 
Smith when he came. He stayed there some 
time, learning to whipsaw, and afterward 
went with Ferguson to San Jose, and built 
the first flourmill there. He then returned 
to the redwoods, and with Smith built a saw- 
pit, felled trees, and began to hew lumber for 
sawing, sometimes sleeping in the pit, the 
log cabin of Bill being some distance from 
the work. Smith and Weeks parted when 
Coppinger came, and Weeks joined the latter 
in making shingles and sawing lumber.
ARCADIAN LIFE. 
He gives the following picture of his 
Arcadian life in the San Mateo redwoods: 
    “I spent a happy life working in the Pul- 
gas redwoods. Sometimes I would go to San 
Jose, Yerba Buena, Santa Clara, Monterey 
or Santa Cruz; was not overburdened with 
constant hard labor. Our time was our own, 
and we knew how to enjoy it. Except the 
house of ‘ Bill, the sawyer,’ and the residence 
of the Soto family, there was not a building 
in the township. The Indians who had not 
been gathered into the fold of the missions, 
had rancherias in the canons amid timber-clad 
mountains. Hill and vale were alike thronged 
with game, while the herds of the ranches 
roamed literally upon a thousand hills.  

” The marsh lands occupied a greater area 
than they do to-day, while the cultivated or 
occupied (pasture) lands were covered with 
wild oats that grew ‘shoulder high with a 
horseman.’ 

” Thus the land lay for many quiet and 
peaceful years. Immigration began in 1841, 
and increased with each succeeding year, 
compounding in numbers like interest on a 
note of hand in the flush times of the gold 
discovery. 

” In 1844, Dennis Martin arrived in the 
Sacramento valley, and in the following year 
came into San Mateo redwoods, to the Corte 
Madera rancho, then owned by John Cop- 
pinger, James Pease, John Pepper and Charles 
Brown was then there. Brown was occupy- 
ing the Mountain Home ranch. 

” The country was now on the eve of an 
eventful change. It passed under the sov- 
ereignty of the United States in 1846, but 
nothing more than the rumor of the war with 
Mexico reached the shades of the San Mateo 
redwoods. 

” It was not so with the discoveiy of gold, 
which took place two years later. That event 
came like an electric shock, and was felt in 
every town, mission, ranch and camp, not 
only in California, but throughout the civil- 
ized world. Dennis Martin and others rushed 
from the peaceful redwoods to the gold pla- 
cers. Martin, contrary to the general rule, 
was successful; and in 1850 he returned and 
located near Searsville, and in the fall of that 
year, he erected a water-power sawmill on 
San Francisquito creek, about three-fourths 
of a mile below Searsville. This was the first 
sawmill ever built in the country. But it 
was only run for a few weeks, when it was 
carried away by a flood. 

” The next mill was built by a man named 
De’ Hart, on the Mountain Home ranch, then 
owned by Charley Brown. De Hart let a 
contract to one Whipple to run the lumber 
to the tail of the mill at $25 per 1,000. 
Whipple soon made money enough to buy 
the mill, selling a large quantity of lumber at 
$75 a 1,000, for which he did not have to pay 
for the hauling at the rate of $25 per 1,000. 
He afterward moved the mill and broke up. 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: First Sawmill in San Mateo County

John Vonderlin: Meet Josiah P. Ames

Story from John Vonderlin
Email John ([email protected])
Hi June,
  Here’s a biography of Josiah P. Ames, from “The History of San Mateo” book on Archives.org.
 
Hon. J. P. Ames. The following narrative of the life of one of Califor- 
nia’s earliest pioneers will be found worthy of perusal, replete as it is with 
incidents of a busy life. Mr. Ames was born in England, on January 23, 1829. 
He came to the United States with his parents when but six months old, and 
the family settled in New York City. They moved to Hartford, Connecticut, 
and in Dutchess county, New York, the subject of our memoir received his 
primary education at the common schools, and his academic learning at a 
seminary in that county. After finishing his education, he went to New York 
City, and was one of the men who came to this coast in the historic Stephen- 
son’s regiment in 1847. To give the reader a better knowledge of the move- 
ments of Mr. Ames while with this regiment, we refer them to its history. 
Suffice it to say, that he was honorably discharged at Monterey, in September 
1848. We next find him in the mines at Mokelumne Hill, Calaveras county, 
and in this place, and other mining regions of California, he remained until 
185G, when he went to Half Moon Bay, San Mateo county. We believe of all 
the men that we have had the privilege of writing about in California, those 
who came in Stephenson’s regiment possess the most interest. They were all 
bold, resolute men, men who let no trifles hinder them from achievino- the 
purposes and aims of life which they had mapped out. At the very ouset of 
Mr. Ames’ coming to Half Moon Bay, his public career commenced. He was 
first elected supervisor, in 1860, and this office, with the exception of a few 
years, he continuously held until 1881. In 1875 he was appointed by Gover- 
nor Booth to settle the Yosemite claims, and so faithfully and well did he 
perform this duty, that he was selected by the republican party and elected to 
represent the people of his county in the legislature, in the winter of 187(5-7. 
He was appointed warden of the State Prison at San Quentin by Governor 
Perkins. We believe, therefore we say, that no man has ever had charge of 
this institution that has’ managed it with more economy, and we know no one 
has made the improvements, which will result in so great a profit to the state, 
as those made by Mr, Ames. The jute factory has in the past year saved to 
the farmers of this state money enough to endow Judge Ames with a princely 
fortune. In 1867 he erected a landing, the first on the coast in this county, 
which for all time to come will bear his name. 
———————–
You can also email John Vonderlin here
New: Hey come check out Ekaweeka – The Small Business Community. 

Here is my profile 

Thanks!
John Vonderlin 

— Ekaweeka – The Small Business Community
http://www.ekaweeka.com

Posted in John Vonderlin, Josiah P. Ames | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: Meet Josiah P. Ames

John Vonderlin: Part 2: Pescadero’s Oil Potential

Part II

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John ([email protected])

Hi June,
   This is Leon Harnett’s second installment in his evaluation of the potential ol wealth of the Coastside. It was published in “The Daily Alta” on December 2nd, 1865. He sounds like a fascinating person, though his predictions of Pescadero being the largest city on the Coastside and the amount of oil available in the region was vastly overstated. I’m looking for the letter he mentions at the end of this one, that was going to detail the efforts that were planned or had commenced to harvest the expected bonanza of black gold. Enjoy. John
 
 SANTA CLARA AND SANTA CRUZ OIL LANDS. No. 2
 
 Editor Alta :— I have not hurried my account of the oil lands of these counties as much as many residents therein desired, for reasons which appeared to myself satisfactory. After an examination of this region, extending through eight months, I hold these lands, from their extent, richness, and proximity to this city, so important to tbe State, that I was naturally anxious to have my account supported, either by the evidence of further developments, or of disintererted parties, who, since my communication in July, have been out to examine for themselves. If, therefore, this letter, like the former, should be considered exagerrated, I am fortunate in having the testimony of your correspondent from San Gregorio, the northern extent of tbe region in question, the editor of the Santa Cruz Sentinel, and several men of wealth and character in San Francisco, who, at my instigation, after a personal examination, have recently made extensive locations on 
PESCADERO CREEK. 
 I have, now. therefore, the advantage of writing under endorsement in every particular. It is true, I spoke of Pescadero Creek in high terms, because, apart from its marvellous indication of oil in abundance, it has advantages of a local nature no other section in the State possess; and, those advantages, even if its prospects were less flattering and reliable than those of more distant regions, would justify all I said of its claims upon the attention of capitalists. Tbe subject, taken in connection with tbe depressed state of our mining interests at the present time, is suggestive and it may be neither uninteresting nor unprofitable to pursue to the end. I live under a settled conviction, from a thorough knowledge of those counties, and some knowledge of petroleum, that if we have oil in this country, Pescadero will ultimately equal Oil Creek and Pithole, in the East. Two years ago, I was laughed at by the public as a visionary dreamer, for saying our supply of copper In 1866 would exceed tbat of Great Britain, with her foreign and colonial produce added, by 120,000 tons per annum, if our mines already developed, with those on the point of being developed, were worked with prudence to their utmost capacity of yield. At the close of 1865, tbe public find my prediction verified within a fraction, and now give me credit for its boldness. My calculations about oil are made from as safe a basis as those I made about copper, and I have equal confidence in their proving true eventually.
 The Localities of Pescadero, San Gregorio, Lexington, Etc..
 Possess advantages for economical operations which no others possess that I have seen in the entire distance from Del Norte to San Luis Obispo. In oil, in gold, copper, or any other branch of mining, while limply presumptive, or partially proved, I think the safest way (xxxx?)  our own lands, and the speediest way to attain outside capital is to open satisfactorily, the nearest and most accessible locations first, leaving the more distant and consequently more expensive, even if superior in other respects, to abide the results. By concentrating our energies and funds to develop thoroughly any given locality requiring but small expenditure, we prove to the world at once that we really possess the resources that we claim, avoid injuring the reputation of the State by long delays, and  escape expenses no people can sustain in legitimate undertakings. If successful near home, no dfficulty would be found in obtaining capital for distant regions…………………….. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
A New Era Dawning
   There can be no doubt a new era is opening upon us, the importance and benefits of whioh we cannot at present estimate, if welfare only true to ourselves. To-day a private letter was received from New Yo»k. by a friend of mine, in which it says that,  “we cannot estimate, even with California hyperbole, the amount of capital tbat will be ready to be poured into your oil regions next season,  nor will it be necessary, to secure this capital, tbat you have flowing wells-a good pumping well, or good, satisfactory indications will be sufficient.” Let us, then, buildup the reputation ot tbe State legitimately, and rise individually with tbat reputation. We have had enough of stock-jobbing in mining, let us now, like  other nations, be satisfied with reasonable profits. Those profits tbe oil regions contiguous to San Francisco offer with a very small expenditure : and there is no reason that I see, why we should refuse to spend a few hundreds sensibly because we have squandered many thousands foolishly. Prudence in oil may redeem the losses of imprudence in gold, silver, and copper. Of tbe existence of oil. in abundance throughout tbe Coast Range, there is now no doubt. but we must not expect to get it at a lesser depth than other people. Had anyone, two years ago, told them England  would get oil by boring, the probability is the person would have been locked up immediately in a lunatic asylum; yet to-day they have good pumping wells there.
   For these reasons, and others I have yet to adduce, I maintain the preeminence of Pescadero amongst our California oil regions; eight months of continued exploration I think ought to render me capable of judging its merits. For a period of nearly tbree years I have endeavored to be a true exponent of tbe mineral wealth of this State. So far from indulging in exaggeration, I honestly believe my calculations of tbe importance cf our oil products, like those of our copper products, are rather under than over the reality. In the future, as in the past, I shall be careful not to be caugbt making a false statement of the facts coming professionally within my personal knowledge and observation. I do not intend, if possible to be deceived myself or to deceive others. When, therefore, men, who positively know nothing of the region in question, travel around town and state that the country from San Mateo to Santo Cruz, especially Pescadero, is not to be compared with the Humboldt, not that I abate one tittle of the intrinsic value of tbe latter, it would be more modest, certainly it would sound much better, if they added. ” at Ieast such is our opinion.” The public then, would know better wbat importance to attach to their  statememts.
   In my next letter I shall give an accurate account of all the operations commenced, and about to be commenced, with their prospects and results, in these counties during tbe past season, with other details and experiments, which, I think, will be interesting to those desiring of promoting tbe welfare of our State. Leon Harnett  San Francisco. November 25th, 1865.
Posted in John Vonderlin, Oil | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: Part 2: Pescadero’s Oil Potential

John Vonderlin: 1865 Article Raises Big Hopes for Oil in Pescadero

Part I
Story by John Vonderlin
Email John ([email protected])
Hi June,
   This is an amazing article from the July 28th, 1865, issue of “The Daily Alta.”  Having lived one summer in the wilds on the Mattole River, just north of the “Lost Coast,” and west of the town of Petrolia, in Humboldt County, I had been aware that California’s first oil well was drilled there. That was the same year this article was written. Why the information about Pescadero, this article contains is not well known, let alone trumpeted by civic boosters is quite peculiar. I know nothing about the sceptical and ever so wrong, Professor Brewer,  any of the land owners mentioned, or the reporter Mr. Harnett, but will investigate further.
   The tiny, blurred type of this nearly one hundred and fifty year old newspaper article made for a lot of OCR errors, but I’m excited about doing Part 2, which appeared some months later. Note that Pescadero was in Santa Cruz County at this time, as the boundary adjustment that produced the present counties’ borders wasn’t done until 1868.
Enjoy. John  
 
 
SANTA CLARA AND SANTA CRUZ OIL LANDS – NO. 1
 
THE PETROLEUM QUESTION
    Editors Alta: Up to this period, with one slight exception, I have taken no part in the discussion of our State being, or not being, an oil producing country. To me it has ever appeared an insult to educated intelligence, as well as to practical .experience, to maintain the negative. Were the existence of petroleum a modern discovery, confined to the Atlantic States, or were our local indications of its existence less extensive, or less reliable than they are, there would be little rational argument against its existence in California as a question of science; but, having been used for a variety of purposes in the earliest ages of the world, and having been found in every quarter of the globe at the present day, there appeared to me to be none, and indeed there can be none. The problems worked out in the laboratory of nature are never wrong. Wherever she indicates reliably the existence of a mineral, labor, if directed and controlled by scientific principles, soon renders the presumption a reality. If surface evidences are reliable in gold, silver, and copper, for instance, why should they not be believed in oil? As a matter of science, or experience, would it not be preposterously absurd to maintain the negative of such a proposition, and ignore the principles by which our actions in both have been governed from time immemorial? If rock is auriferous, we seek and find gold; if argentiferous, we seek and find silver; if cupriferous, we seek and find copper; if oleaginous, who shall say we ought not to seek and find oil? Professor Brewer? Then that gentleman makes himself wiser than the world, a conclusion in which the people of California by no means concur now.
INCREDULITY 
   It is difficult to understand the silly incredulity we have shown in this matter, because one man of reputation and position has chosen to say, ex cathedra, that asphalt is no evidence of oil. Without taking exception to this theory, which by the way is very questionable, our claims to having an oil-bearing country do not rest on that point. Tbe intelligent and practical observer, much less tbe professional explorer, will find in our coast range such evidence of petroleum outside the asphalt, that the most sceptical must be convinced. Within the limits of my own travels on the upper ranges of the coast, extending fifteen hundred miles north and south, and from fifty to seventy east and west, I everywhere found such natural indications on the surface, that it seemed to me simply ridiculous to doubt the existence of oil in quantity underneath. To-day, public opinion has changed from what it was a month ago. The recent developments at Humbodt, and elsewhere, though obtained at a very small expenditure of labor and capital, have swept the incredulity from our midst, and compelled the people to recognise the proven fact, that our State is as rich in oil, as in gold, silver, or copper.  I have waited with impatience, but not without confidence, for this change. because until then a man could do little good by writing upon our oil interests. No matter what he found, or how honestly speak, the public would not attach tbe same importance to his communications that they will now, and thus he would probably injure rather than benefit the districts he sought to serve. All would be regarded as vague, problematical, speculative, to be forgotten as soon as read, or perhaps not read at all.
   But now, as tbe public are prepared to receive facts as facts, and principles as principles, inevitable in their laws and relations, and to see a great commercial interest springing out of the oil business; I propose to give a series of letters on the “oileoligy” of these counties, whose claims to notice are second to none in the State, but which, so far, have been entirely overlooked. I shall commence with
PESCADERO. 
   This little town, as it name implies is of Spanish origin, lying on the ocean, about  forty miles south of San Francisco. It is easy of access by three different routes-by steam in tha Salinas, by stage from San Mateo, or by Horseback or buggy from Santa Clara, the expense of either being only a few dollars. The most convenient route at present is from Santa Clara, where the traveller is advised to put himself under the care and direction of Mr. Cameron, of the hotel, who will supply all his wants in the most liberal and excellent style. From this town to the oilregion is about twenty-five miles, through as charming a country of valley and mountain as the world produces. On crossing the summit, the ocean opens to view on the west side, the bay and valley on the east, with Goat Island looming up distinctly in the distance, unfolding in an instant one of tho finest conceptions of the grandeur and immensity of distance the mind can contemplate. Thence to the oil ground you begin to descend the great sink to its ocean outlet, where the fluid has collected and wasted for centuries, with towering forests of redwood in front, and well cultivated ranches on the rolling slopes on every side. At the bottom of this ridge lies Tar Water Creek, where the Oilwas first found. 
    We hear great accounts, from Humboldt and the far south, of splendid discoveries, showing that with oil, like gold, “distance still lends enchantment to the view.” These accounts I am satisfied are correct; but, for all that, we have quite as good springs at our own doors, and, moreover, possessing numberless advantages the others do not, of which I shall speak more fully hereafter? The Tomkins, Gurnsey  Co. location eight years ago discharged a volume six or eight inches of liquid asphalt continually, but is now covered by a slide. This liquid has been boiled for sixteen consecutive hours, becoming more limpid to the last. At times the escape of gas is so terrible as to shake the house like an earthquake. The formation is excellent: sandstone, with shale walls, lying horizontal from here to the Rowley claim, aome four hundred yards below, the oil seeps from the banks all the way on both sides of the creek, while the loose, fragmentary rock, lying in the water, is so saturated with oil, that it has become black, breaking like bread, and burning like dry wood. The Rowley claimis a fac simile (sic) of thaepreceding, with a large, open, deep well of liquid asphaltum still existing, from which it runs down the creek at times. besmearing everything it rolls over. I have heard the gas escape here so strongly that it sounded as if men were shooting off Colt’s navy revolvers. Both these locations possess the finest advantages for boring with effect. One hundred and fifty feet depth will make a splendid development. From here to Pescadero Creek, perhaps two miles, are other locations of merit. On that stream the asphalt disappears altogether, and the indications become more naphthalic. The rock also is finer and whiter, exhibiting almost pure oil. The banks, in places, are so saturated that a handfull of sand will nearly all float down the stream, scarcely a third of it sinking. Can Humboldt or anywhere else beat that? I state these facts, marvellous as they may seem, on my personal responsibility. I do not recollect the names of the parties owning this location. All this land up and down the creek is preempted. At the junction of Jones Creek and Pescadero, Mr. Mars, late of the United States Branch Mint, made a very fine location, and beyond him on the main branch of Jones Creek, comes Mr. Smith, of San Francisco, with an equally good claim. These are all in this section of which I have personal knowledge. lam told, however, that claims equally good, though more difficult of access, have been preempted to the headwaters and down to the mouth of Pescadero Creek. Next to the vast amount of oil this land indicates in every direction, the grand advantage over all others is its proximity to the ocean and the commercial city of the State. Steam by water or rail will bring the oil to our stores in San Francisco, with the expenditure of $2,000 for roads either way, while the climate and produce cannot be surpassed. Who can predict tbe growth of Pescadero in five years’ time, when this adjacent land, pours forth its hidden wealth? Already a a favorite resort in Summer, it will inevitably become the most extensive, fashionable, and wealthy town on the southern coast. Permit me in conclusion, through your columns, publicly to. acknowledge my gratitude to Dr. Tomkins. Mr. Cameron. Mr. Rowley, Mr. Jones and others, for attentions and hospitalities I cannot forget.  San Jose. July 25th.  LEON HARNETT
Posted in John Vonderlin, Oil | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: 1865 Article Raises Big Hopes for Oil in Pescadero

John Vonderlin: Willowside Dairy: Yesterday and Today

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John ([email protected])

Hi June,
This is an excerpt from the 1883 “History of San Mateo,” book available for reading or downloading at Archive.org. There is a section in the book covering the dairies of San Mateo and this description of the still existing Willow Side Dairy is included in it.  These days, as they describe below, they raise herding dogs and offer stockherding lessons. They also seem to host a number of competitions and other community events. It is on Stage Road so I must have driven by it. I’ll see if I can get some photos of the historic buildings the next time I drive by. Enjoy. John

Located just outside rustic Pescadero, CA, on the coast between San Francisco and Santa Cruz, Willowside is a herding facility on the site of a restored historic 19th century dairy farm. Various sized enclosures, large open fields, and a wide range of sheep accomodate the needs of herding students from novice to advanced.

Willow Side Dairy Farm. — North of Pescadero, and at the head of the val-
ley of that name, is situated R. H. Brown’s Willow Side dairy farm, em-
bracing a tract of twelve hundred acres of fine arable and pasture land. The
capacious barn — a two story structure, covering an area of sixty -four by one
hundred and twenty feet, is built on an elevated piece of ground a few hundred
yards from the main road from Pescadero to Spanishtown. The cattle are
stanchioned in four rows of stalls. A system of water-tight gutters, skirting
along the row of stalls, receives all the manure from them, both liquid and
solid. The floor is traversed by four tramways, on which a box car travels,
following along by the manure troughs, and collecting from them the offal.
When the car is filled, it is run to the rear end of the building, where it goes
on a platform car, which, running on a track. of its own, carries the loaded
box car to the dumping place, to be utilized in enriching the soil of the farm.
The barn has stalls for one hundred and twenty -eight head of cattle.
The upper floor is the hay floor, having a capacity for storing twenty-two
tons of hay. Here also are two feed cutters, one for cutting roots, and the
other for hay. The latter is driven by horse power, and the hay, as it is cut,
falls into a receptacle below, where it is mixed with grain, and in this shape
fed to the stock.
There is another barn close by, in which seventy-five head of cattle and
young stock can be sheltered, and the hay and feed for them stored.
A short distance down the hill from the first mentioned barn is the dairy
house, three stories high, and twenty-four by forty feet square. It is built
over an excavation in the hill-side, the face of the excavation fronting the rear
wall of the first story; this first or basement story is divided into two com-
partments, in one of which is kept the tubs and everything used for packing
butter. The size of this room is sixteen by twenty-four feet; the other is the
butter room, twenty-four feet square. Its walls, as well as the walls of the room
directly above it, are packed with saw dust, by which means an even tempera-
ture is preserved through all seasons of the year. The second floor is divided
into rooms corresponding in size with those on the floor below. The smaller
one contains a large iron boiler, always full of hot water, which is conducted
by distributing pipes to every part of the building where its use is required.
The larger apartment on this floor is the milk-room. In the center of it is an
elevator for raising or lowering milk from one floor to the other. Outside of
the building and close by the milk-room, is a one hundred and twenty -five-
gallon tank, into which the pails of milk are emptied as it comes from the cow,
and from which it passes through a pipe into the milk room. The top floor is
used exclusively for making and curing cheese. Cleanliness is a cardinal fea-
ture in the entire building. Evervthing has an air of freshness and neatness,
nothing whatever of an offensive nature being allowed to accumulate; all the
refuse is carried away through pipes to the hog-pens. (Bacon, anyone?)
There is also on the premises a stable and barn for horses, complete in all
its details. Mr. Brown has now one hundred and sixty-five head of cattle on
the farm, but when the improvements already begun are completed, he will be
able to maintain two hundred and fifty cows, and take care of their products.

—————————

Biography of R.H. Brown

R. H. Brown. This gentleman, who is one of the prominent dairymen of
the coast, was born in Pointe Caupee Parish, Louisiana, November 25, 1839,
and received a thorough education in his native state. In 1860 he left his
southern home and came to California, via New York and the Isthmus of
Panama. His first settlement was in Klamath county, where he mined until
1862, afterward migrating to Idaho, where he remained engaged in mining,
sawmilling, etc., until 1872, when he returned to San Francisco. During a
period of seven years Mr. Brown acted as secretary for various mining com-
panies, finally removing in 1879 to this county, where he purchased an exten-
sive dairy ranch, a full description of which is given in another portion of
this work.

——————————–

Posted in John Vonderlin, Willowside Dairy | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: Willowside Dairy: Yesterday and Today

1896: Lobitas, Lobitos, Lobetus…Let’s call the whole thing off…

Hi June,
   This brief article from the March 3rd, 1896, issue of “The Call,” is a small piece of the puzzle of the history of oil production on the Coastside. Besides providing a date and a few names to research (Langley and Richards and the Taylor ranch) its usage of “Lobetus” as the spelling of Lobitas or Lobitos, illustrates the difficulty in locating all the relevant articles about a specific subject. I suppose given the fact the Coastside was the difficult-to-access hinterlands for “The City” folks at this time, I shouldn’t be surprised at the crude state of factchecking in the newspapers of that time. Enjoy. John
Langley & Richards, Los Angeles oil men, recently secured a lease of the Taylor ranch, on Lobetus Creek, about five miles southeast from Halfmoon Bay, and will bore for petroleum as soon as the weather settles.
Posted in John Vonderlin, Lobitos | Tagged , | Comments Off on 1896: Lobitas, Lobitos, Lobetus…Let’s call the whole thing off…

John Vonderlin: 1902: Black Gold Gusher….

Story from John Vonderlin
Email John ([email protected])
Hi June,
   Here’s an article from the June 6th, 1902
issue of “The Call,” that undoubtedly
helped drive the “Black Gold Fever,” that
gripped the local area and the nation at
this time. Enjoy. John
 
OIL IS STRUCK OF GOOD GRADE
OWNER TELLS OF WELL IN SAN
MATEO AT HALFMOON  (sic)
 
Much interest will be attached during
the next few weeks to the possible devel
opment in the region of Half moon Bay,
in San’ Mateo County. Oil of 50 gravity
and better has been struck there. There
have been many conflicting stories con
cerning the find. Parties who are inter
ested in other properties than the one on
which the oil has been discovered have
inquired . earnestly about the read facts.
One extravagant rumor has^ been given
currency to the effect that the well, which
is owned by Gulberson, Sallee and Hayne,
started In as a gusher at the rate of 1000
barrels per day. The real fact appears to
be, from the statement of an entirely re
liable party, one of the owners, that the
well started about ten days ago, with a
high gas pressure and ran for one hour
at the rate of twenty-five barrels for the
hour. Then the flow was shut off. The
owners do not attempt to forecast any
thing concerning the future of their prop
erty, but give out that they are satisfied
that they have a good well. They have
now sunk six wells in all. The producer
is the sixth.
   If the new discoveries should determine
that there is a new district in San Mateo
County it will be of much significance and
will generally encourage the northern ex
plorers for oil, especially in the counties
adjoining San Mateo County. Oil has not
been produced in commercial quantities
north of Summerland hitherto.
————————
Here’s a link to the big Lakeview Gusher
Posted in John Vonderlin, Oil | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: 1902: Black Gold Gusher….

John Vonderlin: The Oil Field in the Redwoods of La Honda

oil1
Story by John Vonderlin
Email John ([email protected])
Hi June,
   Meg was reading the thick and slick, years-in-the-making Draft Report from Mid-Pen about their decades long future development plans for the La Honda properties and noticed a paucity of information about the La Honda Oil Fields, which are on their properties.  She mentioned it to me and after reading a paragraph from the Draft online, (openspace.org) where they said there was anecdotal information about production from the wells I reviewed the info I had gathered.  Somebody didn’t do their research, that’s for sure, as there is an incredibly detailed report online by geologist Scott Hector all about the fields, their yearly production of oil, gas and water over a 25 year period, and much, much more The report on the Zamora and La Honda Oil Fields is #Tr30 at the following URL:
   As long as I was examining that subject I grabbed a few related articles from the Newspaper Archive. This one from the February 6th, 1896 issue of “The Call,” discusses the oil boom that was beginning on the Coastside, including Half Moon Bay. There are a number of names I’m looking at in this article that hopefully will lead to interesting threads. Enjoy. John
 
SAN MATEO’S OIL
AND GAS WELLS
Thirteen Grants Recorded
in Favor of the Cali
fornia Company.
TWO THOUSAND ACRES.
Terms Upon Which the Drilling
and Operating Contracts
Are Drawn.
THE COMPANY NOW SINKING.
Prospects Favorable for Striking
a Good Flow at Half
moon Bay.
 
REDWOOD CITY, Cal., Feb. 5.—Thir
teen oil and gas grants have just been
placed on record, which have been as
signed to the California Natural Gas and
Oil Company, and apply to 2082 acres of
land on the coast side of San Mateo
County.
The contracts are drawn so that the
party of the first part grants all the oil
and gas in and under the described prem
ises, together with the exclusive right of
the second party to enter therein for the
purpose of drilling or operating for oil,
gas, water, etc., on the following terms:
Should oil be found in paying quantities
upon the premises the second party agrees
to deliver to the first party, in the pipe
line or at the wells, the one-sixteenth part
of all the oil produced and saved from
said premises.
If gas only is found, second party agrees
to pay $10 to $50 each a year for the prod
uct of each well while the same is being
used on the premises, and the first party
shall have gas free of expense to light and
heat the dwellings now on the premises.
There is a clause which provides that if
no well is completed within one year from
date of agreement then the grant shall be
come null and void unless the second party
shall pay to the first party the sum of ($lO
to $100 are the amounts named in the pre
sent instance) for each year thereafter that
such completion is delayed.
. These grants were all issued about nine
months ago in favor of E. J. Beane, his
heirs or assigns, and they have been
assigned by Beane to the California Gas,
Oil and Land Company, a corporation, of
which L. L. James, 419 California street,
San Francisco, is secretary.
The company is now sinking a well on
the San Francisco Savings Union Tract at
Halfmoon Bay. It is reported that they
are down 700 feet and that there is a
seepage of one and a half barrels of oil a
day and a flow of gas. The prospects of
striking a good flow of oil are considered
very favorable.
Posted in John Vonderlin, La Honda | Tagged , | Comments Off on John Vonderlin: The Oil Field in the Redwoods of La Honda