Archive for October, 2008

Abe Lincoln in Pescadero?.?.?..Story by John Vonderlin

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John (benloudman@sbcglobal.net)

Hi June,

President Abraham Lincoln in Pescadero?
Not quite, but I did find a connection between Honest Abe and Pescadero recently. I was reading Dr. Alan Brown’s  book, “Place Names of San Mateo County,” when I found this entry under the heading of Lincoln Hill:

“Due South of the center of Pescadero.  A year ago or two ago, a gentleman from San Francisco proposed to have a flagstaff on this noble looking mount on condition that it should be named “Lincoln Mount,” all of which was done. The last winter’s storms and winds, however, carried away the staff, but the spot is still cherished and will always bear the memorable name of Abraham Lincoln, of course. (S.F. Alta 3/27/1867)” Dr. Brown then commented,  “The adoption of the more natural present name was doubtless made almost immediately.” Oh, those fickle Pescaderans.

I must confess I’d never heard this name, but I drove through Pescadero yesterday on one of my forays to the coast and took these pictures
of the “noble mount” that presides over Pescadero. I searched around its base in the downtown area and found no obvious trails to its top, but I’ll investigate a little more in the future. Unless my memory is faultier then I think, there are a number of historical photos of downtown Pescadero that were obviously shot from the commanding view the top of this hill must provide.
What was more interesting to me was the source of this little historical tidbit, the “S.F. Alta.” A quick check of Wikipedia brought up this: “In the second half of the nineteenth century, there was a San Francisco-based newspaper called The Daily Alta California (or The Alta Californian). Mark Twain’s first widely successful book, The Innocents Abroad, was an edited collection of letters written for this publication.”
Using “The Daily Alta California” as a search term I brought up the following Wikipedia entry.
“The Daily Alta California was a San Francisco newspaper descended from the first newspaper published in the city, Samuel Brannan’s California Star which debuted on January 9, 1847. Brannan, who had earlier assisted in publishing several Mormon newspapers in New York, had brought a small press with him when he immigrated to California as part of a group of Mormon settlers in 1846.
With Dr. E.B. Jones as editor, the California Star was the city’s only newspaper until an older publication, the Monterey Californian, moved to Yerba Buena, as San Francisco was then called, from Monterey in mid-1847, becoming simply The Californian. The city was about to undergo rapid changes as the California gold rush got underway. The California Star appeared weekly until June 14, 1848, when it was forced to shut down because its entire staff had departed for the gold fields. Its rival newspaper had suspended publication for the same reason on May 29.Later that year, Sam Brannan sold his interest in the moribund California Star to Edward Cleveland Kemble, who also acquired The Californian. Kemble resumed publication of the combined papers under the name Star and Californian on November 18, 1848. By 1849, the paper had come under the control of Robert Semple, who changed its name to the Alta California. On January 22, the paper began daily publication, becoming the first daily newspaper in California. On July 4, 1849, Semple began printing the Daily Alta California on a new steam press, the first such press in the west. Other names commonly referring to the paper include the Daily Alta Californian, the Alta California, and the Alta Californian.”
With Abe Lincoln and Mark Twain being a couple of my childhood heroes I’m looking forward to checking out the ongoing nationwide 20 year long online project part of which is detailed below. Perhaps I can find the full article about that “gentleman from San Francisco” and find out why he paid to memorialize Abe in Pescadero. Enjoy. John
Under the NDNP and LSTA grants, the Center has digitized over 150,000 pages of California newspapers spanning the years 1849-1911. They include the Alta California (1849-1889); the San Francisco Call (1900-1910); the Amador Ledger (1900-1911); the Imperial Valley Press (1901-1911); and the Los Angeles Herald (1905-1907).

Comments off

The Coburn Mystery: Chapter 56

And then San Mateo County Assemblyman and attorney James T. O’Keefe proposed that Pebble Beach become a county park. I’m assuming he was referring to the beach of fancy pebbles, more “valuable” when it wasn’t covered by the incoming tides.

O’Keefe’s constituents in San Mateo were big fans of the resort, he said, and the best thing he could for the voters was to open Pebble Beach as a public park. As another powerful incentive, he pointed to the prosperity that would rain on Pescadero.

The Assemblyman painted a hopeless picture of the situation then, the Coburn “problem,” and all the gory details about the fence (building it up, tearing it down. Again. Again. And Again.) He reminded voters that Loren Coburn owned 3 miles of shoreline, part of the Butano Rancho, from the mouth of Pescadero Creek to Bean Hollow Lagoon.

General store owner J.C. Williamson wrote: “The passage of the bill will forever set to rest any controversy as to the present ownership and right-of-way.”

Most people probably just wanted the beach open so they could enjoy the pebbles.

The “San Mateo Times Gazette” supported Assemblyman O’Keefe’s “Pebble Beach War,” opining that the “most graceful” thing that Loren Coburn could do was to give way to the majority opinion, explaining that the landlord would, in the long run, be “losing little and gaining much more.”

But that was not to be.

Comments off

The Coburn Mystery: Chapter 55

By June Morrall

But soon after the new road was built, Loren Coburn locked the gate to Pebble Beach.

Again.

It was quickly reopened.

“…Loren Coburn claims the beach itself and tells people who take pebbles from it they are committing grand larceny. As the beach is covered every day with ocean tides, his claims are preposterious. The popular road to Pebble Beach has been used for over 35 years, but Loren Coburn objects to it. He has provided another road, but has not dedicated it to the public, and the people will not use it since they think it is a subterfuge to get them to abandon the old road, whereupon they would lose both. The state should buy or condemn a roadway to this beach and keep it open to the public. Then, when the public has unrestricted access someone under proper restriction should be allowed to build a casino on the shore, and in one summer Pebble Beach would rise in popularity as a resort second to none on the coast. People in Pescadero would be glad to do things to make the resort attractive if they were assured by the legislature that the public would be protected in its rights.”

Comments off

The Coburn Mystery: Chapter 54

By June Morrall

If you have been following my storyline, you know that the Pescaderans and Loren Coburn agreed on nothing. They especially disagreed over the road to Pebble Beach, believing it was a public not a private road.

Many folks described the way to Pebble Beach as a “crooked cow trail,” a dirt road as wide as a horse-drawn stagecoach or two. They said the road had been used for a very long time.

Coburn didn’t want to fight over the cow trail so he started digging himself a new road, a new private Pebble Beach road, possibly a toll road.  Building the road was a family affair, and I can imagine things could get pretty silly with Loren’s frequently tipsy brother-in-law Marraton “Whiskers” Upton supervising the daily work.

Some folks called Loren Coburn’s new road an act of benevolence. He was paying the bills, and one newspaper wrote: “…and it doesn’t look as if he wanted to close Pebble Beach to the public….”

Truth be told, when finished, the new road was described as “a beautiful drive and more pleasant than the old cow trail…”

Comments off

The Coburn Mystery: Chapter 53

By June Morrall

Whenever times got rough, the villagers of Pescadero got together at Pebble Beach as they did on a Saturday in May of 1892.

It was just like old times: Early in the morning a caravan of coaches “bearing all kinds of humanity….to indulge in the pleasure of picnicking…” rolled over the hill from Pescadero to the seashore. Once there “…they stretched out on the clean pebbles and chatted for an hour while turning the pebbles over and searching for beautiful carnelians and other rare stones. When they tired of this quiet enjoyment, they tossed pebbles at one another. In the background the ocean murmured.”

This was the Pebble Beach the oldtimers loved.

Serene as the South Coast scene was, there were visions of  “Coburnville” in the Pebble Beach-goer’s heads. One of millionaire landowner Loren Coburn’s men had already constructed a very visible hitching RACK—-for use by the future hotel and its beach-bathing guests.

The rumors grew as loud as the roar of the Pescadero waves on a stormy January morning: The railroad was coming. Coburn talked officials into building a station at Pebble Beach where he was building his new hotel, and, according, to the scariest story, “would kill the town back in the hills,” (and that would be Pescadero.)

The reality of Coburn’s hotel was what the locals were talking about at Pebble Beach on a pretty Saturday in 1892.

Now more details were available: It was 50-room hotel: The lumber was being shipped from San Francisco to Pigeon Point. Coburn’s Pebble Beach Hotel was to be a two-story establishment with porches and porticoes at the mouth of Bean Hollow. And it was set to rival the most famous California hotels of the day: the Coronado and the Del Monte.

————-

Are you interested in knowing more about architectural styles, including a porticoe mentioned in the Coburn chapter above. I have found the little book (below), “How to Read Buildings” fun and helpful, although it refers more to buildings you’d see in cities.

Comments off

1850s-1870s: Portuguese Whalers at Pigeon Point

Comments off

Vanishing Beaches: Story by John Vonderlin

Story by John Vonderlin
Email John (benloudman@sbcglobal.net)
Hi June,
While researching my next posting about “The Stage Hole,” I came across a forum that had old articles (1970) about the planned dams in Pescadero’s watershed. Somebody mentioned the effect of coastal dams on our beaches and somebody else wondered where they got such nonsense. Since I’ve commented on the connection of coastal watershed dams and other factors to our disappearing beaches, I thought you might want to see the following quote:
“Dams along coastal streams that effectively impound water also trap the sand destined for the coastal beaches. Thus, the benefits of flood control or increased water supply and recreation have been countered by the gradual reduction of sand input to the coastline. Dams reduce sediment supply to beaches in two ways: by trapping sediment behind the dams and by reducing the peak river flows or floods that, under natural conditions, would have transported sand downstream to the shoreline. More than 1,400 dams over 25 feet high or impounding more than 50 acre-feet of water have been constructed across California, with 539 of these dams located in the coastal watersheds that drain directly into the Pacific Ocean . . . The combined effect of these coastal dams has been to reduce the average annual sediment supply by more than 25 percent to California’s 20 major littoral cells.”

by Gary Griggs, Kiki Patsch, and Lauret Savoy, University of California Press. Enjoy, John.

Comments off

W.J. Savage & the Giant Trees of the South Coast

Story by June Morrall

Email June (june@halfmoonbaymemories.com)

(Image: Mr. Dunn, the editor of the Coastside Comet poses beside a felled tree.]

Woodman, spare that tree!
Touch not a single bough!
In youth it sheltered me,
And I’ll protect it now.
George Pope Morris (1830)

Idealistic and poetic, W. J. Savage, the son of a former San Gregorio hotel proprietor, found his polar opposite in the ambitious Palo Alto lumberman John Dudfield.

In 1913, the differences between the two men centered on a small grove of giant redwood trees located in the Coastside’s remote Lynch’s Gulch in Lobitos Canyon, south of Half Moon Bay.

Growing up, Savage watched trees felled in the more easily accessible Coastside canyons. Lynch’s Gulch could only be reached on foot, and Savage was convinced those redwoods would remain untouched by the logger’s saw.

But he was wrong. Savage soon learned the trees were threatened and that John Dudfield’s lumber company had begun the largest logging effort ever in order to clear Lobitos Canyon.

When Savage was a small boy in the early 1870s, his father often brought him to visit the redwoods in Lynch’s Gulch, which was named for an Irishman Paddy Lynch, and his kindly wife who resided among the redwoods between Purissima and Tunitas canyons.

W.J. Savage’s father, according to my research, was probably R.W. Savage, owner of the San Gregorio House in 1872.

The elder Savage described his San Gregorio House, a first-class site for trout fishermen as “one of the most homelike and and beautiful places in California.”

The hotel stood on the San Mateo County Coastside, 44 1/2 miles south of San Francisco via the San Mateo and Pescadero stage. Mr. Savage always kept a team of horses at the ready to take guests to “bathe” in the salty ocean half a miles away.

But San Gregorio was simply a tiny farming community that could not compete as a resort with, for example, Mrs. Swanton’s well known Pescadero hotel, not far from the famous pebble covered beach that drew tourists from near and far.

On the frequent trips to Lynch’s Gulch, R.W. Savage brought young W.J. along. He watched while his father purchased stakes, posts and pickets from “One-Eyed Sam” and “Big Bill.”

These woodsmen–colorful alumni of the Coatside’s early logging days–shared a picturesque cabin in the redwoods, and they exposed the impressionable lad to the magical lore of the forest. The little boy came to believe in the existence of “Wild Rose Ann,” a nuturing, protective spirit whose mythological powers extended deep into the shade of the big trees.

W.J. Savage recalled that the land embracing Lynch’s Gulch had been owned by Major McCoy, who in an attempt to preserve the trees–some more than 10 feet in diameter–sold pieces of the forest to many individual owners. McCoy believed that by diluting the decision process, the redwoods would remain undisturbed.

“One Eyed Sam” and “Big Bill” also spun stories of the energetic German, Henry Dobbel, dubbed “the prince of Purissima” –a once-thriving farming community and rival of nearby Half Moon Bay. Dobbel was the driving force behind Purissima, a promising hamlet at the crossroads which boasted a schoolhouse, general store, post office and stage stop until a potato blight turned Purissima into a ghost town.

Savage was about the same age as Redwood City’s Tacoma Mill Company executive, John Dudfield, who wed Lillian Jury in 1897. Shortly after the wedding, Dudfield established his own lumber company, headquartered in Palo Alto. Forecasting a great demand for lumber following the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake & Fire, Dudfield searched for dependabe sources of wood, according to author Frank Stanger’s “Sawmills in the Redwoods,” available at the San Mateo County History Museum in Redwood City. [The book was out-of-print when, some years ago, South Coastsider Ken Fisher generously funded publication of a "new" edition.]

He found his timber in the Lower Pescadero Creek area and signed a stumpage contract with the Levy Brothers, well known for their string of Coastside general stores. Dudfield logged the land west of Memorial Park, setting up his mill in present-day Loma Mar.

With the invention of the steam donkey engine in 1881, Dudfield witnessed the transition from skid roads and oxen to yarding by cable. The old-fashioned methods of logging that some found charming were gone; the oxen were put out to pasture, and their drivers were replaced by cables winding on a spindle. The handsome lumberman found he could pull logs out of remote places with the use of cables and a small donkey engine.

Prices were good enough to warrant the three-day trip in a wagon drawn by six horses to carry 4,000 feet of lumber from the mill in Loma Mar to Dudfield’s Palo Alto lumberyard.

While the steam donkey engine changed the face of logging, the crew members remained an unusual touch.

James Foster, a millman who worked in Purissima Canyon and a decorated sergeant who displayed bravery in South Africa’s Boer War (1899), murdered San Gregorio bartender Claude Packard for no known reason, before turning the weapon on himself.

To all observers, the murder was inexplicable. Perhaps the men who chose logging were hard-drinking, hard-living and unpredictable.

Some six years after John Dudfield began logging in the Lower Pescadero Creek, the timber was exhausted, and the mill was closed. Dudfield next eyed Lynch’s Gulch in the upper Lobitos Creek, where he planned to mill shingles in 1913.

W.J. Savage’s precious grove of redwood trees was in jeopardy.

Lobitos Creek, between the Purissima and the Tunitas, –and shorter than both of them –also had the smallest grove of redwood trees. It was always believed that there were too few trees to warrant a larger lumbering project, and that it was too inaccessible for a small one.

Perhaps that very inacessibility made it a challenge for John Dudfield to provide a source of shingles for his Palo Alto lumberyard. He planned to launch the largest attempt ever to log the roadless Lobitos Canyon.

Dufield’s shingle mill was dragged into the canyon and set up among the trees at the bottom of Lynch’s Gulch, long after the death of Paddy Lynch and his wife. Above it, a tramway was built to take the shingles to a higher yet level, according to “Sawmills in the Redwoods.” Wagons were loaded at the tramway landing and made their way over a road from “Irish Ridge,” “Bald Knob,” to Tunitas Canyon Road at “Grabtown,” a shantytown, with Palo Alto as the final destination.

It was a frigid day in January 1913 when W.J. Savage, accompanied by a boy carrying a rifle on his shoulder, hiked into the isolated Lobitos Canyon. Even the sun felt cold. An icy north wind blew as the pair followed the rugged pathway through fields and thickets on the pilgrimage to the site of the doomed redwood trees.

No trees had been felled there since 1882, and W. J. marveled at how a three-decade reprieve had returned Lynch’s Gulch to the primitive, wild grandeur he remembered as a child. This would be his final visit to the grove he loved.

When Dudfield’s Mill came into view, Savage’s first thoughts were: “This is where the bodies of the big trees will be cut and slashed without a pang…”

Under a profusion of lacy ferns, Savage recognized the old sled road used by the old-time loggers. A donkey engine, two big boilers, cable drums, piles of iron rails, journals and boxes lay on the ground. He noted grading for the railroad by the railroad had commenced. But on this bitter cold day, none of Dudfield’s crew could be seen.

Nostalgia must have overwhelmed Savage when he saw “One-Eyed Sam” and “Big Bill’s” cabin, now “frail and covered with moss,” standing near three, new, but less picturesque cabins built by John Dudfield. He wondered where “Wild Rose Ann” was.”

Savage walked past the woodsmen’s old cabin, and further up the trickling streamlet, the source of Lobitos Creek, where there never had been any sled roads and no trees had been felled. It was there that he admired a 10-foot-wide redwood tree pointing skyward.

A great sadness overwhelmed W.J. Savage as he recalled his youth and the magical forest he had known. As soon as he returned home, he penned a long letter to the “Redwood City Democrat.”

Under the headline, “Plea for the Last of the County’s Giant Trees,” W.J. poured out his heart with these words: “Wheels will turn by the force of wheels, saws will rings, men will laugh and joke, a few dollars will change hands, millions of shingles will be made, but, alas, upon that spot the last of San Mateo’s redwoods will disappear.”

But John Didfield did not completely log out the canyon. He shut down the mill and reopened it in 1920. This time, with the use of trucks, he was able to haul shingles to Palo Alto. In the mid-1920’s, Dudfield suffered a stroke and the business was liquidated.

Later fire destroyed the mill and tramway. Some small-scale logging occured periodically but some virgin trees, up to 7-feet in diameter, may still grow in the lonely gulch.

“The dreamer sees and knows what should be done,” wrote W.J. Savage in 1913. “Where is the man with a few thousands to spare who will save this grove of redwood and secure for himself a living monument more enduring than the most costly mausoleum ever chiseled from marble?”

W.J. Savage’s gentle nature poetic skill and great love for the giant redwood trees was not enough to save them all. But his words stand as his own monument.

Comments off

Save the Redwoods Timeline

Save the Redwoods Timeline

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John (benloudman@sbcglobal.net)

Hi June,
It turns out there is still an Olmsted and Bros. Map Co. in Berkeley, specializing in trail maps apparently. I believe it all springs from the following excerpts. Note that it is Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. as Sr. died in 1903. John Charles Olmsted, Jr.’s stepbrother was surely involved too. They must have visited, surveyed, etc. all our local state parks or places the Redwood League hoped would become State Parks, Butano included.  Enjoy. John

1927

California Governor C.C. Young signed legislation creating the California State Parks Commission and funding a state park survey by landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted.

1928

California voters approved funds to establish a state park system and allocated $6 million in state park bond funds for acquisition of park lands. Save the Redwoods League led the campaign to win public approval of these bonds.
Olmsted’s report of his state park survey was published. It served for many years as the blueprint for state park acquisitions and development

Comments off

Dr. Alan K. Brown's Book of Place Names for San Mateo County

Story by John Vonderlin

Email John (benloudman@sbcglobal.net

[Dr. Alan Brown's book of place names is available for purchase at the San Mateo County History Museum in Redwood City. The museum is located in the historic courthouse, an adventure in itself.]

Hi June,
While reading Dr. Brown’s book, “Place Names of San Mateo County,” I came across a listing for Bean Hollow. In the “Coburn’s Folly”/Bean Hollow thread you posted recently, I had hypothesized that Bean Hollow or it’s Spanish equivalent, “Canada del Frijol,” might be from as early as the Portola Expedition, (though I had only my sketchy memory and not any proof.) I had thought that it might have been named after the bean-shaped seeds of the coastal Lupine, some species of which have a long history of being used as a food source, though others are poisonous. Considering what Portola’s expedition were eating by that time in the expedition, it didn’t seem out of the question
Here’s Dr. Brown’s thoughts on the matter:  “This is a precise translation of the Spanish “Canada del Frijol,”  a name which seems to have been applied in the 1840s. Perhaps, some ex-Mission Indian had a bean patch there. The present English translation was in use by 1861. “Arroyo de los Frijoles,” “Frijoles Creek,” and so forth, which are found on most maps, stem from an error on the Coast Survey maps of 1854, and are emphatically rejected locally. The creek running through the hollow is called Bean Hollow Creek and was called in Spanish time the “arroyo de la canada de frijol.”
The Ballena Ranch sketch of 1838 calls it “Canada de la Laguna” (Lake Hollow) and Gonzales’ sketch map of Ano Nuevo Ranch, about 1844, calls it “Canada Sienegosa” (marshy hollow.) “
While Dr. Brown doesn’t have the definitive answer to its origin, I think it’s safe to say it has nothing to do with the Portola Expedition. He’s written several books about the early European explorers to the Bay Area, including Portola, and he’d know if there was a connection if anybody did.
In another matter related to Coburn and Dr. Brown, I had theorized in my posting that the F.L. Lathrop that Mr. Brown had said was the source of the renaming of Bean Hollow Lagoon to Lucerne Lake in 1923 might be related to Jane Lathrop Stanford, the co-founder of Stanford University and the wife of California Governor, Leland Stanford.
I’m not much of a genealogist, but I have been able to confirm that Jane had four brothers. One of them was Charles Gardner Lathrop,   Mrs. Stanford retained him as a member of the Stanford board of trustees, and in 1892 made him treasurer and business manager of the University. During his stewardship of Stanford which lasted until until 1914, Mr. Lathrop had an almost twenty year working relationship with Frederick Law Olmstead. Mr. Olmstead, is the “American Father of Landscape Architecture”.

New York’s Central Park, The Cal Berkeley Campus and Stanford University are just three of the hundreds of famous projects he planned in his career.
(Great Wikipedia article “Frederick Law Olmsted)
When he retired in 1898 because of dementia, his apprentice son, Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. and another stepson continued his legacy for over fifty years. They were instrumental in starting the National Park system. Many of the Parks’ designs (including Yosemite, where there is an Olmsted Point) are of their creation. (another good Wikipedia article “Frederick Law Olmsted Jr.”)
I know that Charles Lathrop named his son Leland Stanford Lathrop and his grandson was named Leland Stanford Lathrop Jr., but there were three other Lathrop brothers. Perhaps, they wanted just as illustrious names for their sons.
The land company that you mention in “Coburn’s Mystery,” that bought Coburn’s land after his death and that employed the mysterious F.L. Lathrop of Lucerne Lake fame, may have been owned by the Hearst Corporation. He certainly loved coastal ranches. More when I find out. Enjoy. John

Comments off